Stolen Goods. The Outlook for Russia

The Pall Mall Gazette, 20 March 1918

Diplomatic Transcription

In future history, whatever other attributes may be claimed for the Kaiser, he may undoubtedly be allowed to have attained preeminence as a “receiver of stolen goods.” No future palliation will ever succeed in erasing from his character that indelible stain.

For surely it must now be clear to everyone in every country that Great Russia’s territory has been stolen from its people by diabolic craft and made over by disgraceful surrender to an unscrupulous foe.

Lest we forget, it is useful, even at the cost of repetition, to chronicle the past events. The first gigantic lie propagated by the present usurpers was that our Emperor had voluntarily abdicated his throne and had forsworn the oath which he gave as anointed head of the great Orthodox people. That falsehood was quickly followed by a series of others, the objects of which were again to mislead the public in Russia, as well as abroad. Our country was assured that the Emperor’s abdication was not due to an attack upon his personal autocracy. Indeed, so certain of this was the Emperor himself that he designated his brother as successor and provisional ruler, as was then publicly announced. In the meantime, the whole of Russia was promised that her representatives would be asked, as a Zemsky Sobor, to come in and express their views on the changed position of affairs, and this not for the first time in our history. 

For in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries—in fact, up to the time of Peter the Great—the Government had been accustomed to appeal for opinion and advice to a consultative body, in which were represented the clergy, the nobility, the merchant class, and even some of the peasant community. 

 

The Climax of Chaos.

 

But the ultra despotic Peter, in his zeal for drastic reforms, abolished both the Zemskie Sobori and the Patriarchate (vide “The M.P. for Russia,” vol. II., page 352). And I must add in passing that by these measures Peter the Great became almost hated by the Slavophil party, whose motto was “Greek Orthodoxy, Monarchy, and Nationalism.”

But let us again come to more recent events. I have already dilated upon these in some previous writing; but memories are short, and repetition may on that ground be excised. Already some of these events, although so recent, seem almost difficult to realise. The abolition of the police, the opening of prison doors for the release of even the worst criminals, the free use of alcohol (after a two years’ period of prohibition), the institution of the so-called “Soviets,” with ill-defined powers and duties, but whose despotic activities, backed by large sums of mysterious origin, consisted in demoralising the Army and the Navy, who were bidden to disband to their homes, where free grants of land awaited them, the general throttling of the patriotic Press, and punishment of honest protest by imprisonment and death; and, finally; the crowning enterprise, the attack on the Greek Orthodox faith, and wholesale robbery of churches, banks, palaces, museums, private residences, and even schools. As an accompanying serenade to this scene of action, we have had the songs of MM. les Assassins on freedom, equality, and justice!

Thus has chaos reached its apogee. How can a country whose representatives have cast aside all principles of religion and morality be expected to entertain even the most elementary notions of common honesty, including obligation to pay the country’s debts?

What Can Be Done?

 

Now, naturally, we come to the question: Can nothing be done—and what is to be done— and when? To me the answer seems wonderfully clear. Endeavour by all possible mean to replace the present usurpers by people who recognise, not only the common duty of  repaying the moneys borrowed for continuance of the war, but also the duty of observing all other honourable engagements: In this way would be prevented the continued sale of stolen goods to our country’s enemy.

Concentrated power under divine inspiration can accomplish great and noble ends. For example, the emancipation of the serfs in 1862, the abolition of vodka in 1914, the recognition of Russia as protector of the Slavonic world, the reunion of Poland, and the intended rescue of unhappy Armenia from the Turkish yoke.

Concentrated diabolic power, on the other hand, has for the time being annihilated Russia.

Conclusion. If you English friends would, once for all, reject the lying calumnies which have been directed against our Imperial Family generally a choice from amongst that numerous body would not be very difficult of one who would recognise his duties, not only to his own country, but also to his country’s supporters and Allies.

People Mentioned in the Essay
Countries Mentioned in the Essay
Citation

Novikoff, Olga. “Stolen Goods. The Outlook for Russia.” Pall Mall Gazette (London), March 20, 1918.

Response

No